我的网站

您当前的位置:主页 > 我的网站国内 >

作者:王秉 来源:原创 发布日期:08-21

重庆森林

两名乌军官企图暗杀泽连斯基被抓,美俄回应来了_我的网站

穆桂英挂帅

A |     

A busy scene at the Port of Shanghai on July 24, 2026 Photo: VCG
    A busy scene at the Port of Shanghai on July 24, 2026 Photo: VCG
China's rapid rise in innovation capabilities has drawn broad recognition and positive assessments from the international community. However, some have taken a different stance, expressing concerns over China's technological and industrial advancement and even promoting the so-called "China Shock 2.0" narrative for various reasons, including the unfounded claim that China's industrial development is limiting others' growth opportunities.
A closer look reveals why this narrative does not hold up, for two fundamental reasons.
First, this narrative deliberately overlooks the inclusive, open and empowering nature of China's innovation.
China has always been a committed practitioner, active promoter, and major contributor to global economic, trade and technological cooperation. Through technological advancement and industrial upgrading, China has not only developed itself, but also provided the world with an increasing number of "innovation dividends."
For instance, digital economy, technological innovations in areas such as artificial intelligence applications, mobile payments and e-commerce have provided developing countries with valuable pathways for digital transformation. In the green energy sector, advances in China's photovoltaic, wind power and new energy vehicle industries have directly driven down the global cost of renewable energy, offering affordable solutions for countries tackling climate change. In consumer markets, high-quality, efficient, and cost-effective Chinese products have expanded global supply, reduced living costs and helped ease inflationary pressures worldwide.
Moreover, fast-growing Chinese innovation-driven companies have delivered returns of several times or even dozens of times for investors from around the world. 
Companies from around the world can quickly find partners in China across the entire innovation chain, from research and development (R&D) and pilot production to mass manufacturing, making the commercialization of innovation more efficient.
They have not only succeeded in the Chinese market, but also strengthened their competitiveness globally. Facts have demonstrated that China's emerging technologies and products bring opportunities rather than shocks, and empowerment rather than threats to the world.
Second, it ignores the fundamental trends of technological innovation and the underlying dynamics of industrial evolution.
China's innovation has been built through years of strengthening its own capabilities. In recent years, the country has continued to increase investment in research and development, with its R&D spending ranking second globally. 
Funding for basic research has reached a record high as a share of total R&D expenditure, while its pool of scientific and technological talent continues to expand. Through closer collaboration between the scientific community and industries, China has made rapid technological progress, driven continuous industrial upgrading and taken a leading position in some fields.
Innovation-driven development inevitably fuels industrial transformation and the dynamic reshaping of global production capacity, which is a natural outcome of international industrial division and cooperation. 
For example, after years of technological accumulation, China has seized the opportunities created by the global green transition and developed competitive strengths in the "new trio" industries - new energy vehicles, lithium batteries and photovoltaic products - which have gained growing popularity in global markets. Portraying China's industrial upgrading as a "shock" is, in essence, a rejection of the broader historical trend of economic globalization.
"Innovation dividends" represent a positive-sum game, as the benefits of technological progress ultimately serve humanity. Distorting China's technological and industrial innovation and promoting the so-called "China Shock 2.0" narrative reflect outdated zero-sum thinking in some countries, while also revealing attempts to use criticism of China as a pretext to further advance protectionist policies.
Cutting through the rhetoric of protectionism, it becomes clear that the so-called "China Shock 2.0" narrative and "China overcapacity" claims are politically driven narratives that are detached from reality and lack factual basis.
Over the past decade, China has remained a major engine of global economic growth, contributing around 30 percent to global growth. In the past, China mainly provided the world with "market dividends" through its vast domestic market and cost advantages. Today, while continuing to offer greater "market dividends," China has also created "development dividends" by serving as a stable anchor and important hub for global industrial cooperation through its industrial growth. It is also providing the world with increasing "innovation dividends" through technological advancement.
China's market advantages, industrial development and technological progress are generating growing "market dividends," "development dividends" and "innovation dividends." These benefits, working together and reinforcing one another, are creating greater development opportunities and broader space for the world, offering a key perspective for understanding "China Opportunity 2.0."
Amid a complex and volatile international landscape and slowing global economic growth, innovation has become a crucial pathway to counter downward pressures and generate new growth momentum. Addressing global growth challenges requires greater cooperation in innovation. Rather than spending efforts on crafting the "China Shock 2.0" narrative, some countries should focus on domestic structural reforms and enhance their industrial competitiveness through openness and cooperation.
Embracing China means embracing the future. By using technological innovation to drive industrial innovation, China is accelerating the development of new quality productive forces. At the same time, China continues to expand high-level opening-up and provide new opportunities for the world through its own development. A more open and innovation-driven China will continue to deliver greater development dividends and work with countries around the world to build a more prosperous future.
This was compiled and translated by the Global Times English edition based on an article published in the "Chisu Jinsheng" economic commentary column of the People's Daily on August 7, 2026.
。    
阅读此文大概需要2-3分钟,诚邀您点击右上角“关注”按钮,先点后看,养成习惯,您的支持与鼓励便是我们创作的最大动力!
要给普京的就职仪式“献礼”吗?戏剧性一幕出现,乌克兰两名上校暗杀泽连斯基未遂被抓,美俄接连回应,说了些啥?
这段时间,乌克兰总统泽连斯基的小日子可以说是过得不怎么顺心,一方面是具有重要战略意义的重镇恰索夫亚尔或将失守,一方面是乌克兰内部时不时传出要闹政变、推翻政府的消息。
正所谓祸不单行,上周六,俄罗斯官方宣布,将泽连斯基、乌陆军司令等多名乌克兰高级官员列入通缉名单中。
乌克兰方面对此不以为然,认为这是毫无意义的做法,不过是俄罗斯用来吸引关注的手段罢了。但还是表示非常不满,认为俄罗斯这是将乌克兰的尊严按在地上“摩擦”。
没想到俄罗斯的行动这么快就来了。据观察者网报道,本周二,乌克兰国家安全局在“电报”社交平台发布消息称,抓获了两名企图暗杀泽连斯基的乌克兰国家保卫局军官。
乌克兰国家网表示,其中一名上校是乌国家保卫局的部门领导安德烈·古克,他被指控收集并传播泽连斯基等人的机密信息。
乌国家安全局还表示,俄罗斯的计划是密切监视泽连斯基以及其他乌克兰高级官员,他们原计划是用导弹来袭击目标,在必要时可以使用自杀式无人机。这两名涉案者被指控犯下叛国罪等罪名,将面临终身监禁。
值得一提的是,乌克兰国家安全局宣布抓捕了两名刺杀泽连斯基军官这天,克里姆林宫恰好在举行普京的就职典礼,正式宣誓就职后,普京开启第五个总统任期。难道说,这两名乌克兰上校刺杀泽连斯基,是准备给普京的就职仪式“献礼”?
这一点得到了乌克兰的证实。乌方透露了更多细节,称这次暗杀行动是俄罗斯国家安全局策划的,第五局的特工网络用金钱策反了这两名乌军官,并秘密向他们提供了大量的武器装备,包括自杀式无人机,让他们找机会暗杀泽连斯基,当作就职“礼物”送给普京。
美国方面表示,对乌克兰挫败了潜在暗杀泽连斯基企图感到非常高兴,俄罗斯总统新闻秘书佩斯科夫则是称,乌克兰方面放出的消息不太可能是准确的。

B |

毕竟从本轮俄乌冲突爆发以来,乌克兰方面就曾多次指控俄罗斯对泽连斯基实施了“斩首行动”,但每次俄方都强调,这些指控是毫无依据。
其实,幕后主使也不一定是俄罗斯,毕竟在泽连斯基被俄当局官方通缉后,乌克兰内部反泽连斯基的势力就顺势而起,决心政变推翻泽连斯基,早日结束战争。
要知道,俄乌开战后,俄方给了乌克兰很多次谈判的机会,希望能坐下来好好说。但泽连斯基百般不愿,已经把乌克兰捆上了北约争霸的战车,誓死效忠于美国,打压俄罗斯的生存空间,引起了民愤。

C |

本来泽连斯基的任期这个月就要结束了,可没想到,两个月前泽连斯基却以“国家处于紧急状态”为由,取消了总统选举,引起了诸多质疑。
所以说,在这个时候暗杀泽连斯基的,真不一定是俄罗斯,也可能是乌克兰国内的反对派在行险招,为了早日结束战争推翻政府。
由于平台规则,方便后续为您推送类似文章,以最快的速度获取最新资讯,如果您喜欢这篇文章,请点赞、评论、转发,谢谢!

Current article:http://www.chaochangkuanbandangyogeseng.sbs/pynfw/20260826/99487.doc

Published on:01:55:42


Copyright @ 2016-2018 我的网站 版权所有